VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-14
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:02 AM
Roy25101 Roy25101 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Jekyll Island, GA
Posts: 56
Default RV-7/9 plans vs. RV-14

Ill apologize in advance if this has been addressed before but I am trying to decide between starting a -9 or a -14 and I am curious about the plans. I have been working on a -10 and love the step by step plans and illustrations. I understand the -14 is similar. For those folks who have built a -7/9 and are now working on a -14, could you give me an idea of the differences in the plans. Are they marginally better or significantly. Also, is the -14 a easier plane to build due to improvements in the kits themselves. I appreciate folks taking time to answer my questions. This is a great resource with a great group of people.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:05 AM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
Default

The newer type of plans are light years ahead of the older ones. You can download examples on Vans website.

That being said, thousands and thousands of RV's were built using the older ones.
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Project Sold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:24 AM
Beagle's Avatar
Beagle Beagle is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 61
Default

Please correct me if I am mistaken but I believe the -14 kits are not only match-drilled but they are drilled to final size.
__________________
-Bob "Beagle" Brents
RV-8 (Reserved: N808B sorta like "BOBB")
(Empennage: 95%)
(Wings: 60%)

?To invent an airplane is nothing. To build one is something. To fly is everything.? - Otto Lilienthal

https://www.facebook.com/fliegen.beagle
Dues Happily Paid 2019
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:45 AM
nilberg nilberg is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 233
Default

There is a benefit of being builder no. 1,500 instead of no. 50.....

This site and several excellent builder logs supplements the 'old' building manuals.
Having many different points of views instead of just one is priceless....even if the one comes from some great builders in a great company.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:51 AM
YellowJacket RV9 YellowJacket RV9 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Clearwater, FL KCLW
Posts: 1,281
Default

The -9 manual was adequate, but if it was all I had to go by, it would have been a longer process. It is important to read each section completely before doing any one step, study the plans very closely, and also learn from those ahead of you. I had several build logs I followed religiously that saved me from making a number of mistakes that I probably would have had I followed the manual alone. Since these resources exist (and VAF), there is plenty of information out there to build any of the older kits without much issue. But, if you just want to open the book, follow along, and get it done, the newer plans are definitely the way to go. Probably far fewer gotchas and surprises.

Chris
__________________
Chris Johnson
RV-9A - Done(ish) 4/5/16! Flying 4/7/16
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-14-2016, 08:56 AM
johnny stick johnny stick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 301
Default plans difference

For me I was attracted to the RV14 because the plans are better and the holes are pre-punched to final size. But then I started looking and realize there is size able difference in cost of the finished plane. Also the plane size is different too. So I am thinking now my decision between a 9 vs 14 is going to be based more on the physical and cost difference, rather than the plans. Right now I plan to go to vans and see both, fly the 9, and if the 9 fits, the cost difference for me will be hard to justify the 14.
__________________
John
2016 dues paid since 2008
- High hopes fade on a warm hearth stone,
he travels the fastest who travels alone-Kipling
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-14-2016, 09:12 AM
kamikaze kamikaze is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny stick View Post
For me I was attracted to the RV14 because the plans are better and the holes are pre-punched to final size. But then I started looking and realize there is size able difference in cost of the finished plane. Also the plane size is different too. So I am thinking now my decision between a 9 vs 14 is going to be based more on the physical and cost difference, rather than the plans. Right now I plan to go to vans and see both, fly the 9, and if the 9 fits, the cost difference for me will be hard to justify the 14.
What he said ...

Basically, if you can afford the -14, go ahead, it's a better kit ... otherwise, you'll manage with the -9 plans, it'll just require more decoding of plans and drawings ...

I'm doing the -9A, as the -14A is out of my reach money wise ...

Sure would love to see Van's re-issue new style plans for older models still being sold!
__________________
J.F.
Sling 4 empennage kit on order!
Future EAA 245 Member (Hopefully)
Current Piper Warrior PA-28-151 Owner/Pilot
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
http://www.sling4.ninja
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2016, 10:04 AM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brantel View Post
The newer type of plans are light years ahead of the older ones. You can download examples on Vans website.

That being said, thousands and thousands of RV's were built using the older ones.
+1

Since you are asking, it is your first build. Being at the end of my 7 build - the reading, researching, thinking, double checking skills are all finally honed, enough that the 7 plans are adequate, but in the beginning it was a steep learning curve. The measurement of said was the scrap pile, It grew and grew, then started shrinking. Nearly gone now. Vans has come a long long way in design, manufacturing, documentation, and completeness. Stay on plan and all will move smoothly.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2016, 10:06 AM
Rupester Rupester is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mahomet, Illinois
Posts: 2,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YellowJacket RV9 View Post
The -9 manual was adequate, but if it was all I had to go by, it would have been a longer process. It is important to read each section completely before doing any one step, study the plans very closely, and also learn from those ahead of you. I had several build logs I followed religiously that saved me from making a number of mistakes that I probably would have had I followed the manual alone. Since these resources exist (and VAF), there is plenty of information out there to build any of the older kits without much issue. But, if you just want to open the book, follow along, and get it done, the newer plans are definitely the way to go. Probably far fewer gotchas and surprises.

Chris
I fully agree with Chris' comments.
__________________
Terry Ruprecht
RV-9A Tip-up; IO-320 D2A
S. James cowl/plenum
(Dues paid thru Nov '18)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-14-2016, 10:34 AM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default

+1 for the above comment.

If you were building a -9 without any internet, then the instructions in the plans are probably adequate for someone who has prior experience with building airplanes.

I certainly could not have completed my RV-9A without the benefit of many, many build logs and using good old Google searches and VAF.

The plans tell you what to do. They don't tell you what NOT to do, which is where you can learn from others experiences.
__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.