VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 03-29-2016, 04:02 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator View Post
There is nothing unsafe about the BOTH position of this valve. It MAY become unsafe if it is used but even then the airplane won't fall out of the sky.
There are a number of switches in every aircraft that create an unsafe situation if used in flight. Guess what happens if the ignition switch is moved to OFF or the mixture is pulled to OFF? Placards are even not required for these obvious unsafe situations.
Apples to oranges.

The pilot of this aircraft is lead to believe that the aircraft will function normally using a both position on a fuel valve. This is not normal.

The pilot of any aircraft is lead to believe that the aircraft will function normally if the ignition switches are left "on". This is normal!

If you bring an aircraft with a modified fuel system to me for inspection, you must prove to my satisfaction that your modifications are feasible.
If you think that a "both" position on an otherwise standard RV fuel system is feasible, then you shouldn't bring your aircraft to me for inspection.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-29-2016, 04:31 PM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
Apples to oranges.

The pilot of this aircraft is lead to believe that the aircraft will function normally using a both position on a fuel valve. This is not normal.

The pilot of any aircraft is lead to believe that the aircraft will function normally if the ignition switches are left "on". This is normal!

If you bring an aircraft with a modified fuel system to me for inspection, you must prove to my satisfaction that your modifications are feasible.
If you think that a "both" position on an otherwise standard RV fuel system is feasible, then you shouldn't bring your aircraft to me for inspection.
With all do respect Mel, you do good work, but there is nothing normal about any experimental aircraft. That's why the FAA requires the warning to passengers that the aircraft has not been built to FAA standards.
This airplane was certified by someone who pulls their pants on just like everyone else here. I simply vote to give them a break.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-29-2016, 05:02 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,652
Default

And to add, I'm convinced that adding a "both" position to an RV is going to increase pilot workload rather than reduce it - but properly managed (i.e., don't use the "Both" position), it is not "unsafe".

There are plenty of single engine certified aircraft with far more complex and difficult to manage fuel systems than an RV with a "Both" position. Some older Beech products and even the PA-22 with an aux tank comes to mind. Just about every Rocket has you pass through "OFF" every time you switch tanks - a very specific "Fail" in todays aircraft design philosophy.

Best to add the proper valve, but going so far as to ground an aircraft owned and flown by an aware pilot until that happens... a bit much.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C

Last edited by Toobuilder : 03-29-2016 at 06:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-29-2016, 05:19 PM
Bevan Bevan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
I'm STILL a DAR. I have certificated over 800 aircraft. and like Gary, I would never sign off an RV with a "Both" position on the fuel selector.
It is my understanding that the Andair two position valves have a "common" position that technically feeds fuel from both tanks. This is so that fuel is not interrupted from one tank before it begins to flow from the other tank (when switching tanks). If true, it is a safety feature. The difference with the OP's valve is that it may simply be labeled with a "both" position. So in this case, it may be prudent to simply order a new face plate or somehow cover/delete the word "both", and leave the valve itself as is. Best to check directly with Andair and post the findings back here for future reference.

Bevan
__________________
RV7A Flying since 2015
O-360-A1F6 (parallel valve) 180HP
Dual P-mags
Precision F.I. with AP purge valve
Vinyl Wrapped Exterior
Grand Rapids EFIS
Located in western Canada

Last edited by Bevan : 03-29-2016 at 05:21 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-29-2016, 05:23 PM
Bevan Bevan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rightrudder View Post
Here's an alternate test rig. I recommend Stella Artois for test fluid, but this guy looks like a Bud man:

Stick this hat on the fan sitting in front and slightly below you (tell him it's a science project) with one cup empty. See what happens after you begin to suck...if you even get that far.

Bevan
__________________
RV7A Flying since 2015
O-360-A1F6 (parallel valve) 180HP
Dual P-mags
Precision F.I. with AP purge valve
Vinyl Wrapped Exterior
Grand Rapids EFIS
Located in western Canada
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-29-2016, 06:31 PM
rv7charlie rv7charlie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pocahontas MS
Posts: 3,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevan View Post
It is my understanding that the Andair two position valves have a "common" position that technically feeds fuel from both tanks. This is so that fuel is not interrupted from one tank before it begins to flow from the other tank (when switching tanks). If true, it is a safety feature. The difference with the OP's valve is that it may simply be labeled with a "both" position. So in this case, it may be prudent to simply order a new face plate or somehow cover/delete the word "both", and leave the valve itself as is. Best to check directly with Andair and post the findings back here for future reference.

Bevan
Ding!

Some variation on that theme likely applies to most selector valves. If the label says 'both', it *implies* it's ok to operate there, but if it just says 'left-right-off', the pilot should pick one. :-)

A friend sold an -8 with the current 'stock' valve; 45 degrees L & R for tanks. Buyer had fuel starvation in flight with fuel in the tanks; later said that he thinks he might have aligned the handle either fore/aft or in line with the spar because he'd previously owned an RV with one of the old style valves. Nothing wrong with the valve or the label; he just didn't select a labeled position.

To the OP:
If you don't find a blocked vent, is it possible that you finally found the right conditions for the plane to draw from only one side with the selector in 'both'? Even a high wing Cessna will feed unevenly when running on 'both', though it's difficult for it to suck air (unlike low wing planes).

As a FWIW, on my -4, with less than ~1/2 tanks I can disconnect the line from the tanks to the (stock) Van's selector valve without fuel flowing.

You can check for actual flow by selecting 'off', and disconnecting the fuel line at the engine or gascolator, as others have recommended. If you use a tank leak test setup (balloon on one leg of at T fitting, or a manometer tube on the T), you can select a tank and pressurize the tank through the vent. If there are no blockages, you can easily move fuel through the valve and out the line in the engine compartment. Then select the other tank, & repeat. The balloon or manometer tube will protect the tank from over-pressure, & still allow enough pressure to move the fuel through the open valve & line to the firewall area.

Charlie

edit: You won't get 'bubbles' in the fuel by blowing in the vent, unless you have the tank completely full & that wing is 'low'. The vent is (or should be) at the highest point inside the tank.

Last edited by rv7charlie : 03-29-2016 at 06:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-29-2016, 06:53 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

I'm with Mel here. As an A&P his finances are at risk here.
(Can you see the widow's lawyer in court? He'll hold up THIS thread, and say that if ordinary people thought this was bad, then an A&P should surely have known...)
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-29-2016, 07:21 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,652
Default

Are we still talking about the OP and this one specific instance of troubleshooting, or are we off in the twilight zone again?
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 03-29-2016, 07:22 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,768
Default

You are correct. It is experimental and you can do what you wish. But when an airplane goes down because the pilot was flying "on both" and one tank became too low, it goes against all of us flying these homemade airplanes."

You may have the last word.

Please don't call me for an inspection.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>

Last edited by Mel : 03-29-2016 at 07:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 03-29-2016, 07:31 PM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
You are correct. It is experimental and you can do what you wish. But when an airplane goes down because the pilot was flying "on both" and one tank became too low, it goes against all of us flying these homemade airplanes."

You may have the last word.

Please don't call me for an inspection.
If I do, it will be right.

Bottom line here is the RV's are a LEFT-RIGHT fuel system.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!

Last edited by David-aviator : 03-29-2016 at 07:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.