VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-27-2016, 09:48 AM
Auburntsts's Avatar
Auburntsts Auburntsts is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
Default

If you've got some time, check out what I consider to be a pretty comprehensive article on LOP ops: http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182084-1.html
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:01 AM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alpinelakespilot2000 View Post
Larry,
Have you done a lean range test to figure out how lean each cylinder is running? Fuel distribution in an 0-320/360 can be REALLY screwy leaving one cylinder (or more) much leaner than the others and thus increasing that one cylinder's detonation potential, even when it appears that you are well ROP or LOP on the Dynon. I am in this situation so I am very careful about leaning unless I am absolutely certain I'm well below 75%. Am I being too conservative? I don't know what I don't know, so I don't know. Just something to check on yours if you haven't already. Hope this helps.

My peaks are well grouped. 1/2 together and 3/4 together. They end up about 30-40* apart in cruise; I get a better distribution at WOT. This is all somewhat moot for me, as I have purchased a Bendix FI setup that will be going in over the next couple of weeks and should be able to get my peaks pretty close after tuning.
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2016, 11:21 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toobuilder View Post
A minor point in this particular instance, but any time you throttle the engine you are giving up VE. WOT is one of the keys to pulling good BSFC numbers.
...and a good reason to have a CS prop...
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2016, 12:05 PM
Toobuilder's Avatar
Toobuilder Toobuilder is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator View Post
...and a good reason to have a CS prop...
Agree 100%.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.

Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2016, 12:46 PM
Jordan1976 Jordan1976 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator View Post
Mathematically and no other factors considered, 23" MP is 76.87% power.
By that logic, you're at 100% power when on the ground and the engine is off.

RPM is a primary factor in power too. So you can just run 29" at 2,000 RPM which is 75% power as well.

In reality, 22" at 2,400 RPM is about 66% power so you're giving up quite a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:11 PM
hevansrv7a's Avatar
hevansrv7a hevansrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,587
Default Not how you do it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lr172 View Post
My peaks are well grouped. 1/2 together and 3/4 together. They end up about 30-40* apart in cruise; I get a better distribution at WOT. This is all somewhat moot for me, as I have purchased a Bendix FI setup that will be going in over the next couple of weeks and should be able to get my peaks pretty close after tuning.
I'm rusty, but my recall says that the degrees EGT are not the correct way to know if they are peaking together. That's because each sensor's placement and the somewhat different characteristics of the pipe and even variations in the sensors can make this inaccurate. The recommended method as I understood it had to do with when they peak, not the EGT reading itself. There is lots of information about this from GAMI, Advanced Pilot and others.

I hope this helps.
__________________
H. Evan's RV-7A N17HH 240+ hours
"
We can lift ourselves out of ignorance, we can find ourselves as creatures of excellence and intelligence and skill. We can be free! We can learn to fly!" -J.L. Seagull
Paid $25.00 "dues" net of PayPal cost for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (December).
This airplane is for sale: see website. my website

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:25 PM
Carl Froehlich's Avatar
Carl Froehlich Carl Froehlich is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 2,587
Default

Recommend you contact Don Rivera at Airflow Performance and enroll in his engine balancing clinic: http://www.airflowperformance.com/ht...#privatenozzle

You will get the real gouge on LOP operations, and come away with a very efficient engine.

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-27-2016, 06:56 PM
tim2542 tim2542 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Redding,Ca
Posts: 633
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lr172 View Post
My peaks are well grouped. 1/2 together and 3/4 together. They end up about 30-40* apart in cruise; I get a better distribution at WOT. This is all somewhat moot for me, as I have purchased a Bendix FI setup that will be going in over the next couple of weeks and should be able to get my peaks pretty close after tuning.
Peak EGT at the same fuel flow is the goal, *NOT* matched EGT's. The actual EGT value isn't important and we don't care if they all read the same. You want them to peak (at what ever number) at the same time relative to fuel flow.
Once LOP, use fuel flow formula to determine power. Fuel Flow * 15.9 / rated HP for % power.
Tim Andres
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-27-2016, 07:28 PM
PCHunt PCHunt is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auburntsts View Post
If you've got some time, check out what I consider to be a pretty comprehensive article on LOP ops: http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182084-1.html
Great article, I try to read it about once a year! Written in 1999, still true today.
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P

2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-27-2016, 07:51 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator View Post
...and a good reason to have a CS prop...
I guess then I shouldn't be flying LOP with my O-360 fixed pitch prop.



As for how and when I run LOP, I only do it above 6500' DA and start leaning at 65% power, as indicated by the SkyView, and when down low I typically see it drop to about 55% power and less than 7 GPH, as seen in this photo:
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 03-27-2016 at 07:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:28 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.