VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 11-06-2015, 08:33 PM
ethand ethand is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 189
Default RG400 Bundled

Is it safe to bundle multiple RG400 antenna runs in the corrugated tube wire conduit or do I need to separate them?

Thanks
E
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2015, 08:44 PM
Jesse's Avatar
Jesse Jesse is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: X35 - Ocala, FL
Posts: 3,679
Default

It depends mainly what signals they are carrying. Generally the Transponder wire should be separate from others. Receive-only wires have less interference than transmitting ones.
__________________
Jesse Saint
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2015, 08:47 PM
ethand ethand is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 189
Default

Thanks Jesse. These would be Com antenna (x2) and GPS antenna (X2) and depending on room the VOR/Glideslope

E
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2015, 09:04 PM
Jesse's Avatar
Jesse Jesse is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: X35 - Ocala, FL
Posts: 3,679
Default

There are other people that can answer better than I can, but I have regularly had COM coax mixed with NAV coax for short to medium runs with no problems. I always keep the transponder coax separate and short. If you use RG-400 it should be ok, but try not to keep them too tight for too long.
__________________
Jesse Saint
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2015, 10:41 AM
GeraldC GeraldC is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Buda, TX
Posts: 56
Default

I'm a newbie to aviation, but I've spent lots of time in my day job chasing down interference between different RF signals, and I personally would avoid bundling the com transmit antenna with the gps receive antenna if at all possible. By bundling those, you would be bundling a cable with a HUGE transmit signal right next to an important antenna that's trying to receive a TINY signal.

It will probably work if the shielding is good and harmonics are low, but if it doesn't, it will most likely only be a problem when you transmit on certain frequencies whose harmonics land near the gps signal. Given that you won't know the problem exists until you try to use those frequencies, I'd personally try to put some distance between the two antennas.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2015, 11:10 AM
Mich48041 Mich48041 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Riley TWP MI
Posts: 3,070
Default

Bob Nuckolls is an electrical engineer who wrote the book by which many homebuilt aircraft have been wired. Read what he has to say about running coax together.
http://www.matronics.com/searching/g...HOWBUTTONS=YES
__________________
Joe Gores
RV-12 Flying
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2015, 05:34 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default but....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mich48041 View Post
Bob Nuckolls is an electrical engineer who wrote the book by which many homebuilt aircraft have been wired. Read what he has to say about running coax together.
http://www.matronics.com/searching/g...HOWBUTTONS=YES
Note this answer is ten years old, and specifically referred to a vfr gps. Who cared if you lost signal lock for 30 seconds? But if you're in IMC 30 seconds can be an eternity.
If you can avoid running gps cables next to transmitter cables (com, transponder) then do so. If you cannot avoid it, be sure to test the gps for interference from the transmittr prior to actual IMC.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2015, 09:20 PM
RV7A Flyer's Avatar
RV7A Flyer RV7A Flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 2,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeraldC View Post
I'm a newbie to aviation, but I've spent lots of time in my day job chasing down interference between different RF signals, and I personally would avoid bundling the com transmit antenna with the gps receive antenna if at all possible. By bundling those, you would be bundling a cable with a HUGE transmit signal right next to an important antenna that's trying to receive a TINY signal.

It will probably work if the shielding is good and harmonics are low, but if it doesn't, it will most likely only be a problem when you transmit on certain frequencies whose harmonics land near the gps signal. Given that you won't know the problem exists until you try to use those frequencies, I'd personally try to put some distance between the two antennas.
FYI, my 430W install manual lists the following frequencies to be checked for interference with GPS:

121.150 MHz ? 131.225 MHz
? 121.175 MHz ? 131.250 MHz
? 121.200 MHz ? 131.275 MHz
? 121.225 MHz ? 131.300 MHz
? 121.250 MHz ? 131.325 MHz
? 131.200 MHz ? 131.350 MHz

and for 8.33 kHz spacing, add

121.185 MHz ? 130.285 MHz
? 121.190 MHz ? 131.290 MHz

IIRC, these are near the odd harmonics of GPS L1 frequency.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.