VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2015, 07:07 AM
carrollcw's Avatar
carrollcw carrollcw is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 193
Question I think I have uneven airflow....

I now have about 90 hours on my RV7. Now that I have worked out the major kinks, I am trying to refine it a little. I have noticed that on all my flights, 1/3 CHT's and EGT's run hotter than 2/4 while ROP, however once LOP, 1/3 are my coolest cylinders. When I say hotter, the CHT's are about 20 deg hotter and the EGT's almost 100 deg hotter. When LOP, the CHT's are 60 deg cooler and EGT's 100 deg cooler.

This tells me that 1/3 are getting better airflow, thus run leaner than 2/4.

Furthermore, my GAMI spread is about 1.5 with 1/3 peaking first.

So, what can I do? Right now I have the standard ECI updraft sump that came with my Titan engine. I have heard that the Superior sump is better balanced than the stock Lycoming or ECI. Does anyone have any real world experience with this?

Another option is to heat wrap my 1/3 induction tubes, but I think this would just be a patch for the real problem.

If a new sump is the best choice, has anyone swapped out their superior updraft for cold air induction and would be willing to sell me their old sump???

Thanks!
__________________
RV-7 Flying Since March 2015
N412HC
Titan IOX-370
SDS Tunable Injectors
EFII Dual Ignition and Fuel Injection
Garmin G3X Touch
Whirl Wind 200RV Prop
7XS0 Polly Ranch Airpark, Friendswood, TX
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2015, 07:19 AM
Kahuna's Avatar
Kahuna Kahuna is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Hill, NC25
Posts: 2,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carrollcw View Post

Furthermore, my GAMI spread is about 1.5 with 1/3 peaking first.
Assuming your 1.5 is 1.5gph difference between first and last peak. If this is the case, fix this first. this will pull the engine cylinders into a closer tolerance in everything.
__________________
Kahuna
6A, S8 ,
Facebook, Track Me
Gold Hill, NC25
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2015, 07:49 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kahuna View Post
Assuming your 1.5 is 1.5gph difference between first and last peak. If this is the case, fix this first. this will pull the engine cylinders into a closer tolerance in everything.
Absolutely correct, but this is an EFii electronic fuel injection system. Clark can't fix it with a simple nozzle restrictor swap like we can with our constant flow systems. That's why he is hoping to correct an intake mass flow imbalance with a different sump.

I for one would be very interested to hear the results of a swap to a Superior updraft sump.

Clark, the trusty Siemens injectors are supposed to be very closely matched. However, since they are simply o-ringed into the intake tubes, and thus easy to move around, it might be informative to swap the injectors side to side. If the temperature pattern changes, you have an injector flow imbalance in addition to (or rather than) a mass flow imbalance.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2015, 07:51 AM
Jesse's Avatar
Jesse Jesse is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: X35 - Ocala, FL
Posts: 3,679
Default

I agree with Kahuna. If 1/3 are that far leaner than 2/4, 1/3 will run hotter in both EGT and CHT when rich of peak, and cooler in both EGT and CHT when lean of peak. Tune your injectors, assuming you are injected. Do that before changing anything else. If you have 0.028" nozzles in all injectors, I would put 0.027 in 2/4 and run the test again and see how things run.
__________________
Jesse Saint
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2015, 08:34 AM
bpattonsoa bpattonsoa is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indepenence, Oregon
Posts: 341
Default

With my experience in working with a SDS equipped Reno racer, Dan is correct, the injectors are not created exactly equal. They are very close so swapping them around may not nake a big difference, but it is worth a try.

There are companies out there that will very accurately flow test the injectors as part of a cleaning process. The one we used gave us before and after flow numbers. Ours had badly fowled due to inactivity over a few months, but the cleaning returned them to specification.

I don't know if 100LL will be a problem over a long time, but EFI users should keep an eye on their EGT numbers and look for long term changes.
__________________
Bruce Patton
Rans S-20 Raven 796S flying since 2019 (slowly)
RV-6A 596S flying since '99 (Sold)
HP-18 5596S flying since '89
RV-10 996S flying since 2014, quick build wing and slow build fues., - dual Skyviews with complete system, two radio and not much else. Interior completely finished with Zolatone. CF plenum. 1624 lbs, FLYING after a 21.5 month build.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2015, 08:37 AM
carrollcw's Avatar
carrollcw carrollcw is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Friendswood, TX
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanH View Post
Absolutely correct, but this is an EFii electronic fuel injection system. Clark can't fix it with a simple nozzle restrictor swap like we can with our constant flow systems. That's why he is hoping to correct an intake mass flow imbalance with a different sump.

I for one would be very interested to hear the results of a swap to a Superior updraft sump.

Clark, the trusty Siemens injectors are supposed to be very closely matched. However, since they are simply o-ringed into the intake tubes, and thus easy to move around, it might be informative to swap the injectors side to side. If the temperature pattern changes, you have an injector flow imbalance in addition to (or rather than) a mass flow imbalance.
Dan, you are correct, I cannot do a simple injector swap to fix an imbalance. Furthermore, I have swapped the injectors from 1/3 with 2/4 and the temps remained exactly the same. Thus, the injectors are balanced. This is why I think I have an airflow problem, not injector problem. I have heard the superior sump is more balanced.
__________________
RV-7 Flying Since March 2015
N412HC
Titan IOX-370
SDS Tunable Injectors
EFII Dual Ignition and Fuel Injection
Garmin G3X Touch
Whirl Wind 200RV Prop
7XS0 Polly Ranch Airpark, Friendswood, TX
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2015, 09:05 AM
219PB 219PB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Victoria, Tx
Posts: 418
Default

Have you contacted Robert at EFII? I am going with a similar setup and would be interested in his take. I am sure that you are not the first to use the stock sump.
__________________
Paul Bonorden
RV-6A Flying
My Builders Website
Victoria, TX
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2015, 09:15 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carrollcw View Post
Dan, you are correct, I cannot do a simple injector swap to fix an imbalance. Furthermore, I have swapped the injectors from 1/3 with 2/4 and the temps remained exactly the same. Thus, the injectors are balanced. This is why I think I have an airflow problem, not injector problem.
Excellent. You, me, and Bruce all thinking alike. Puts me in good company

Quote:
I have heard the superior sump is more balanced.
And I suspect we're going to find out if it is true or not.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:05 AM
Kahuna's Avatar
Kahuna Kahuna is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Hill, NC25
Posts: 2,398
Default

I saw it was EFII. I assumed that an electronic FI could easily control the amount of fuel dispersed with time open. If this is not the case, then how does one ever control the even distribution of fuel in an EFII setup? Swap sumps until you find the best? Yikes!
__________________
Kahuna
6A, S8 ,
Facebook, Track Me
Gold Hill, NC25
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2015, 11:05 AM
miko38 miko38 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: vermilion ohio
Posts: 83
Default

What is the difference in cht and egt at wot
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.