VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-12/RV-12iS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-12-2015, 07:50 AM
Dave12 Dave12 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Elkton, Md.
Posts: 1,650
Default

IMO the coolant hoses are the most vulnerable of the Rotax hoses. They are fairly close to the exhaust pipes and are not sleeved. I think it would be prudent to use the best quality and best fitting hoses we can find and I also think 5 years is an appropriate life cycle. Regarding oil hoses, I am comfortable stretching the change intervals. I am not advocating 15 or 20 years, but I am comfortable with 10. If fuel hoses are Teflon, I am comfortable with 10 also.
__________________
Wag Aero Sport Trainer built,sold and wrecked
N588DF RV12 #336 built, sold and alive and well in New York
N73DF RV12 #244 built, sold and alive and well in Florida
N91 RV RV9 I wish I could say I built this one! Mark Santoleri hit the ball out of the park on this gem.
Currently restoring a 1978 Citabria GCBC
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-12-2015, 10:19 AM
Sink Sink is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Altha, FL.
Posts: 114
Default

Many tell me in class that they put heat shielding on the coolant hoses that are close to the hot exhaust. You can either take some fire sleeve (3"-5") and split it up the middle or buy some regular fire insulation and wrap either around the affected area. This will help considerably. Over the years I have seen too many oil and coolant hose burnt through inflight because the hoses were touching hot exhaust pipes. Burn a coolant hose through and you can still have reduced power for up to 30 minutes. Burn an oil hose through and you most likely bought a new engine.

p.s.
I have also seen several oil hoses in fire sleeve that had touched the hot exhaust and there was a small amount of damage to the outside of the fire sleeve and the inner oil hose got burned through. You really can't inspect fuel or oil hose in fire sleeve unless they are removed.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-13-2015, 08:37 PM
RFSchaller RFSchaller is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,818
Default

I wouldn't obsess over a few hundredths of an inch considering the hose is elastic and has a clamp
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-14-2015, 05:43 AM
jnmeade jnmeade is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sink View Post
Many tell me in class that they put heat shielding on the coolant hoses that are close to the hot exhaust. You can either take some fire sleeve (3"-5") and split it up the middle or buy some regular fire insulation and wrap either around the affected area. This will help considerably. Over the years I have seen too many oil and coolant hose burnt through inflight because the hoses were touching hot exhaust pipes. Burn a coolant hose through and you can still have reduced power for up to 30 minutes. Burn an oil hose through and you most likely bought a new engine.

p.s.
I have also seen several oil hoses in fire sleeve that had touched the hot exhaust and there was a small amount of damage to the outside of the fire sleeve and the inner oil hose got burned through. You really can't inspect fuel or oil hose in fire sleeve unless they are removed.
Roger, give us a number for how many is "too many" hoses that got burned through. Did these get reported to the FAA?

When you say "I have seen", do you mean you saw them personally? Was this in engines that you worked on, examples held up in class, pictures in a book? I'm trying to get an understanding of the number of these instances. These would seem to me to be so serious that we'd all have seen a lot of information about them if this problem was endemic.

Or is this an expression of "one is too many" and the actual number to your own personal knowledge may be one or two?

If any of these resulted in an accident report, maybe you could pass on the information and wew could research further.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-14-2015, 10:17 AM
todehnal todehnal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky Lakes area in KY
Posts: 947
Default

I don't know how many Roger has seen, but I check my hoses regularly. My buddy, who was building at the same time as me had a problem. When he did his 25 hour oil change, he found the oil cooler hose, VA-214 that makes a tight turn at the right front of the engine was almost burned through. He replaced the line, and I think that he even shortened the little standoff strap. I saw the hose, and it was a bit scary.............tom
__________________
2013- RV12, Kit #119. N123M First flight Nov21. It's a keeper!
1998- RV-9 tail kit, built and sold
1989- RV-6 tail kit, built and sold
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-14-2015, 04:30 PM
funflying funflying is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: arvada, co
Posts: 443
Default FWIW

I too was concerned about how close that particular hose was to the exhaust pipe and wrapped some heat shield material around the fire sleeve where it was close to the pipe. I used stainless tie wraps to secure the heat shield material.

I ordered this silver colored asbestos material from one of the aftermarket providers of stuff for RV's and so far so good. It seems to protect this section of oil line and it has always been on so I don't know any other condition since it was never exposed.
__________________
Patrick Claar
Arvada, CO BJC
RV12, #401, Flying 2013, N612PC
RV6, 1996-2010 sold
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-15-2015, 03:52 PM
dick seiders dick seiders is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Default

Patrick, do you mean asbestos looking material or is it really asbestos? if so get rid of it. The fibers in asbestos are lethal, and it's no longer environmentally legal to use it. Since about 1978 I think.
dick seiders 120093
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-15-2015, 03:59 PM
dick seiders dick seiders is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Default

MMiller, Lockwood no longer supplies the 956143, nor the 956141 11mm hose. They sell 956140 (11mm) for both of the old numbers. It comes in bulk but they'll sell you enough for the two lengths required for about $17.
All your other hose info was right on. Thanks.
BTW, Leaf says they don't have any?? So Lockwood is the place to go for those needing them.
dick seiders 120093


Oops! that was in your post, but they will sell half of the length you mentioned for the $17.

Last edited by dick seiders : 09-15-2015 at 04:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-08-2015, 10:17 AM
N223JH N223JH is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boerne, TX
Posts: 228
Default Probably over-thinking, but...

Pre-planning the 5-year ordeal... Got my order in to TS Flightlines for the fuel and oil hose assemblies. Looking at the Lockwood 5-year parts list for the cooling system wondering how well the larger diameter hose negotiates the bends. They show it as 25.4mm, i.d., I presume.

I could be wrong but the person I spoke to at Lockwood did not seem to be aware of RV-12 differentiation from other 912 configurations and assured me the parts list was all I needed.

What has been the experience among the 100 or so RV-12's certified before mine regarding the applicability of the aforementioned hose? Also, are y'all re-using the original clamps or retrofitting with conventional clamps?

TIA
Jim
#264 flying since 12/10
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-08-2015, 10:38 AM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,026
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N223JH View Post
Pre-planning the 5-year ordeal... Got my order in to TS Flightlines for the fuel and oil hose assemblies. Looking at the Lockwood 5-year parts list for the cooling system wondering how well the larger diameter hose negotiates the bends. They show it as 25.4mm, i.d., I presume.

I could be wrong but the person I spoke to at Lockwood did not seem to be aware of RV-12 differentiation from other 912 configurations and assured me the parts list was all I needed.

What has been the experience among the 100 or so RV-12's certified before mine regarding the applicability of the aforementioned hose? Also, are y'all re-using the original clamps or retrofitting with conventional clamps?

TIA
Jim
#264 flying since 12/10
I can't comment on the applicability of the Lockwood kit, but the spring clamps are used for a very specific reason, so I recommend not substituting screw clamps.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.