VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 08-26-2015, 01:56 PM
Tony Spicer Tony Spicer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 514
Default Quick Build RV-3?

Wasn't all that long ago that many VAF RV-3 fans were saying that if Van would only do a QB -3 they would build one in a heartbeat. Had the S&F tornado in 2011 not totaled my -3, I would most likely still be flying it. Apparently I lacked what it would take to build a second one, so I eventually chose to build a Panther instead. It's currently at the 90/90 stage. The most RV-3 like version of the Panther started flying a couple weeks ago and now has about 10 hours. Short wings and a O-320. If you would like to see how it stacks up against the RV-4, have a look here. You'll find a total of three flight reports in the link.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2015, 05:33 PM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,027
Default

I have followed the Panther with interest.
Good to see some others getting completed and flown.

The comparison to an RV-4 isn't all that surprising.... I think an RV-3 of similar power would compare to the RV-4 pretty much the same way.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2015, 05:40 PM
Lowrider Lowrider is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sandpoint, ID
Posts: 3
Default

Why the Panther rather than an RV-3? I looked on their web site and couldn't find any size on the Panther cockpit width.

I'm building a Patrol/Cubbish LSA now but was focused on the RV-3 when I get done. Panther is really another option but if we can get thru this silly 3rd class medical thing an RV-4 would be another option. I started a dash 4 in 1992 and had it done ready for the finish kit when I ran into a very mild heart attack 3 months after a 2nd class medical so I sold the 4 and had to give up my CFI.

Anyway the Panther has some appeal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2015, 06:46 PM
Tony Spicer Tony Spicer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowrider View Post
Why the Panther rather than an RV-3? I looked on their web site and couldn't find any size on the Panther cockpit width.

Now that the complete kit is available, I could build three Panther airframes in the time it took me to build one RV-3. Cockpit width is 28", comparable to an RV-8.

This isn't the place to try and sell the Panther. All I'm saying is that if you're an RV-3 fan, then give the Panther a look.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-26-2015, 07:32 PM
KatieB's Avatar
KatieB KatieB is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stilwell, KS
Posts: 1,096
Default

As I rebuild Tony's RV3B, my husband is building a Panther. He started his fuselage a couple weeks ago. Tomorrow it will be on the gear. He is catching up to me and I've got 5 years into this RV-3B build/rebuild! Anyone who has wanted a quick-build or pre-punched RV-3 should seriously consider a Panther.
__________________
Katie Bosman
RV-3B sold, but flying!
Next project: ???
Builders gonna build...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-26-2015, 07:33 PM
Lowrider Lowrider is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sandpoint, ID
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks Tony!

The one I'm building is 30" inside so the Panther is pretty good size. I'm intrigued by the difference in build time and that certainly makes a good argument to me. Time gets more important the older one gets so maybe the Cougar will be available to compete with the RV-4 next year when I hope to get this project in the air. I did notice the Panther kit has a lot more extra cost options than the RV-3 so that may be factor too.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2015, 07:55 AM
Waterobert Waterobert is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Laguna Niguel, California
Posts: 62
Default

You got my attention, I still like RV-3b look better, but quick build time is very tempting.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2015, 09:06 AM
ChiefPilot's Avatar
ChiefPilot ChiefPilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,565
Default

I've been somewhat interested in the Panther as a project, especially the "sport" flavor, but I'm not sure I understand the anecdotal reports especially when compared to an RV-4.

For example, a specific RV-4 (160hp, fixed pitch Catto) I am acquainted with has a 10% lower wing loading, a slightly lower span loading, a slightly better power loading, and slightly higher top speed. The math would suggest that not only does the RV-4 have a better instantaneous turn rate (~64º/sec vs ~54º/sec for the Panther Sport) but also a significantly smaller instantaneous turn radius (~162ft vs. ~215ft for the Panther Sport).

It's much more difficult to obtain sustained numbers mathematically, but the lower wing loading, lower span loading, and better power loading of the RV-4 would imply better sustained turn rate/radius performance as well. I would be curious as to the roll, pitch, and G onset rates of the Panther.

I'm still very much interested in an RV-3 as a follow-on project to my -6A, but the Panther Sport is interesting...
__________________
Brad Benson, Maplewood MN.
RV-6A N164BL, Flying since Nov 2012!
If you're not making mistakes, you're probably not making anything

Last edited by ChiefPilot : 08-28-2015 at 10:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-27-2015, 09:06 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default Welcome to VAF!

Joe----------welcome to VAF
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-27-2015, 09:31 AM
ppilotmike's Avatar
ppilotmike ppilotmike is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,964
Default +1 for RV-3

I looked at the Panther at Osh and reviewed it's specs. Being a bigger guy (in girth), I liked the slightly larger cockpit width of the Panther, but, for me, it's still the 3 that I long for. While the build time required is one aspect of a 3 project, you just can't beat the nimble feel and crazy wide operating envelope of Van's "best bird." Plus, it looks as great as it flies.
__________________
Mike Rettig
EAA Chapter 301 www.eaa301.org
VAF Dues Current
RV-10 Working on the "Dreaded Doors"
http://www.mykitlog.com/users/index....ig&project=803
F-14 (Pedal Plane - Daughter's Project) "Flying"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKCyX2FXrlw
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.