| rzbill |
04-20-2008 07:00 AM |
Let's check the loading via "scaling"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Chastain
(Post 216525)
That aileron pushrod bolt was never designed to serve as a stop, and I hate the idea of repeatedly applying unnecessary side loads to the bolt, the bearing, and risking eventual failure. I think you'll be much happier with what the actual engineers have come up with in this case.;)
|
Scott,
I understand scepticizm and you are certianly guaranteed to be "safe" by not altering the design. As an engineer myself, I can assure you that engineers don't always find the most elegant solution right out of the box. Functional yes, but maybe not the "best". I like the simplicity of the plastic bushing, but the stock system is good too.
Anyway, a quick look that the difference between the two systems will show that the AN3 bolt has 10% more cross sectional area than the 2 AD4 rivets, The shear strength of the single bolt is 2.5 times the strength of the combined 2 rivets, and the load impressed on the bolt will be 20% less because of the longer moment arm from the aileron hinge. The only place in my view that is down to similar safety factor as the original system is the bearing area of the 3/16" hole in the aileron bracket A-407 and even then, the loads would be 20% less as stated above. I will use a bushing and not have any worries while in the left seat.
|