![]() |
Jeeeez Dan! You are one hard core DIY'er. Did you also raise the sugar maple trees from sapplings?! Very impressive and interesting process. Congrats.
|
Dan, have you done a torsional vibration study on these props yet????:eek:
|
Awesome work Dan!:cool:
|
Guys,
This doesn't even surprise me. I've seen Dan's work first hand and I've said it before on this very forum, Dan is a CRAFTSMAN! Nice work Dan. |
beautiful!
Dan, that's a stunningly beautiful result! Congratulations!
A nice short chord at the tips. I'd be interested in Paul Lipps' opinion on the design. Andrew RV-8 empennage at 30% |
Mike,
<< have you done a torsional vibration study on these props yet????>> Actually, yes, in a manner of speaking. Propellers have a great many vibratory mode shapes. One reason I decided to design and build my own was the TLAR-designed prop I commissioned from a popular vendor. It fluttered (and failed some crappy glue joints too) in the test cell in Romania: ![]() Flutter onset was at 1850-1900 RPM, which nicely matches the radial's intersection of F1 and 9th order. Compare the blade shape you see above with the new prop. Prop Optimizer Pro does structural calculations as well as aerodynamic design. I don't expect any trouble with this one, but we'll see. There was also a good bit of number crunching for hub design. Notice I did not use the classic "Air Corps" splined hub common to lower RPM radials; they have a history of propeller hub tension failure with overspeed. And I owe Steve Boser at Sensenich a big "thank you" for some frictional torque capacity spreadsheets. Education and recreation, right? |
Very impressive :)
|
Good Lord Dan! That is freakin' amazing!! Nice work man!!
:cool::cool::cool: |
Amazing Dan!
Now I want to see the home-made smelter you're going to use to turn Bauxite ore into the aluminum sheets for your RV....;) Paul |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 PM. |