![]() |
ck this out for an alternative engine
|
Quote:
Dan Chicago RV-9A Empennage |
This is another one that has been discussed at length here. Bottom line on that company, is that they don't answer phones, don't return messages, and don't answer email. I've tried...many, many, many times...:rolleyes:
The only thing that changes year to year on that site, is the date at the bottom. It's too bad too, because I was really interested at one time in the Franklin 220 for my 7. |
Quote:
|
That 7 kit has been "Coming soon" for two years.
I have talked to the factory in Poland at length, and met them at Oshkosh in '07. They are very nice people, and do want to do business! They are working on a FWF installation on an RV they were supposed to purchase toward the end of '07. Once that is done and tested, they will be offering a FWF package for RV's. Maciej is the guy I've been talking to in Poland, and is very helpful. The place in Ft. Collins, CO, has nothing to do with the factory in Poland... The main reason Van's stopped development of this engine with their kits was more to do with engineering the installation than weight. Performance was BETTER than any Lyc they put up front. Climb was better, and cruise speed was a mile per hour or two better. It was just diffucult to get it to fit easily. There are at least two RV-8 builders now flying with the 220 Franklin...David Brand and Gary Stofer are the two I've talked to. Both love the engine. :cool: |
Quote:
I've got about a thousand hours behind the 220 Frank, and love it, but parts availability is becoming a problem. When PZL was running the Frank line they produced complete engines but didn't seem to produce much in the way of replacement parts for the existing fleet. There are also parts compatibility problems between the Syracuse Franks and the PZL Franks because of metric tooling conversion issues and changes in alloys to some of the parts that PZL made. I hope someone finds a way to start producing Franklin engines and parts again because it is a great engine, but it is likely just not economically feasible. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 PM. |