![]() |
Fuel Pump
Good luck on it being the sender. My pump was bad and I had similar indications. I just couldn't believe that with a 0 fuel pump pressure reading that the fuel pump could be bad and engine still run fine. I installed a mechanical gauge for testing and sure enough under high power the pressure dropped way off. Replaced fuel pump and all is well. Pump had about 400 hours if I recall.
|
Here's a thread from my similar experience earlier this year. Turned out to be the mechanical fuel pump.
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...=132918&page=3 |
That VDO pressure sensor has a reostat-like winding inside and it gets worn out at the spot that gets used most often. Hopefully it's that and not the pump.
Talk to Trutrak and see if you can use a voltage based Kavlico or Honeywell sensor. Those seem to be much more reliable. Lenny |
Had the same problem and replaced the fuel pump. Still have the problem.
Grrrr. Ed |
Quote:
Do you happen to recall at what MP the reading went to zero? thanks! |
Guys---back in my old days of turning wrenches, we always ran a mechanical gauge test to verify the reading before condeming anything. The problem as I see it, (and I'm guilty too) is that we've become captive by all the electronic gizmos, and have moved away from what has worked for decades.
So when the pressure readings on the EFIS start to fluxuate, the most natural thing is to condem the pump. I my old world, the natural thing was to condem the electronics----because it was the 'new thing'. And quite many times it was as simple a bad connection. I'll go out on a limb and say thats probably still the case. It would almost be prudent to place an extra bulkhead fitting in the firewall (capped off of course) to allow a mechanical gauge to be temporarily installed in the cabin to check the pressures. The fuel pressuse hose could be re-routed to this fitting, and the gauge connected. Test flight and see if the symptoms repeat. If so, then you've eliminated the electronic devices, and can zero in of the pump. IF the symptoms go away, then zero in on the electronics. We seen guys the spent countless hours and hundreds of dollars or more buying and swapping parts, only to find a mis-crimped terminal or a loose ground. Above all----be safe! Tom |
I am in agreement with Tom Swearengen. Even though the sender is screwed in to what looks to be a perfect ground time and sealant may have compromised that ground. Take a bit of sandpaper and clean up a spot on the sensor. Now fasten a ground wire to the body of the sensor with a hose clamp. The other end of the wire goes to a good ground on the airframe.
This solved a similar issue that I had. A simple thing to check, then a mechanical gauge. The sensors are not that expensive, you will eventually have to replace it, mine lasted 400 hours and the replacement has 550 hours on it and I have a spare on the shelf.... |
My vote for most likely solution . . .
Quote:
The Kavlico is much more reliable and durable (non mechanical), if it works with your system. After replacement you can tear apart the old one and look for the spot on the wiper for confirmation. |
Saville I did as Tom S. Suggested. I used a known good mechanical gauge plumbed into the fuel system. I installed a bulkhead fitting in the firewall and connected the line to the electric sender to it. I made up a line for the cockpit side and temporarily installed the gauge. When flying the pressure dropped to almost zero under power. Flipped on boost pump and all was good. Apparently pump provided enough volume to supply engine at power as the engine always ran fine.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM. |