| Carl Froehlich |
02-21-2016 06:34 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by FORANE
(Post 1055782)
Agree with Bob. Mine was not a Dynon nor current generation, but I have heard from others who have had dual screen current generation EFIS and both have failed concurrently.
|
Interesting how our perspective on reliability has changed. Back in the day we blasted off into the clouds with a single, highly unreliable vacuum pump keeping equally unreliable AIs and GSs spinning. Now we have full redundancy (assuming you are not using a 1960 spam can power distribution system) and we worry about what if everything failed. Add stand alone IFR navigators like the GTN-650 to the mix and you have even more redundancy.
Two points:
- look for the common failure modes that will take away your panel and design in risk mitigation. Things like having all your panel running off an avionics master, or for that matter some wiz-bang smart power box that is not single point safe and the reliability of the panel components are so much higher they never enter the risk equation.
- The battery is the most reliable component in your airplane (assuming you have not abused it). A single master solenoid now makes this highly reliable component far less reliable. Having a way to power the panel if your normal power path fails is a simple example of risk mitigation.
For me I have two PC-625 batteries feeding three busses, two busses being left and right panel power, all via independent and alternate paths to the batteries. Both batteries are used for engine start. There are many ways to achieve your reliability objectives so my only recommendation is to first look at the limiting elements in play and work a better design.
Carl
Dual 10" Dynon SkyViews that have never failed (in service for four years), but I still have traditional Altitude and Air Speed instruments on the panels.
|