![]() |
ADS-B Traffic after 2016 and Dynon?s Solution
As many of you here at VAF may have heard, the FAA has recently announced that they will be turning off ADS-B based TIS-B and ADS-R traffic services for aircraft that are not equipped with GPS position sources that are of sufficient quality starting in early 2016. Details of these changes can be found in this document from the FAA, which also outlines the history of this change: TIS-B_Service_Change_Summary.pdf
Dynon has been involved in discussion with the FAA leading up to this, and we want you to know that the SkyView system has you covered. You will not see a change in traffic coverage in 2016 if you are using a SkyView system with the Dynon transponder. |
Not ones to leave a statement like that and run, we also thought it would be helpful to resolve some of the questions that might still be out there for the E-AB and LSA communities in general about this upcoming change.
Does this affect me? This change might affect you if you have an ADS-B IN device AND an ADS-B OUT device. If you don’t have ADS-B IN yet, you aren’t getting TIS-B traffic, so it will have no effect. If you have no ADS-B OUT device, even if you have ADS-B IN, it will also not affect you, as you are currently not receiving these services. If you have a 2020 compliant GPS, or a Dynon SV-GPS-250, you will also not be affected, and you will continue to see traffic as you do today.I have ADS-B IN and OUT. What will change? First, this only affects traffic. FIS-B weather services are broadcast continuously to all aircraft and are not and cannot be directed to individual aircraft. Any ADS-B based weather data you get today will not change no matter what system you are using.What will I be missing without full traffic coverage? The ground station will no longer consider you a client for TIS-B or ADS-R services and will not send you targets from the ground station. This means that the 90% of aircraft without ADS-B OUT on board will not show up, since they are sourced from ground radar systems. It also means that aircraft with ADS-B OUT which are on a different frequency than your ADS-B IN will not appear (978MHz vs 1090MHz).Do I need a TSO’d GPS to keep getting full traffic coverage? No. You never need a TSO’d device for ADS-B, even for full 2020 compliance. Just one that meets the “performance requirements” of the TSO.I have a Dynon SkyView system with Dynon’s Transponder. What do I do? Dynon believes strongly that traffic display is an important safety feature for our customers. While not a replacement for the eyeball, cockpit traffic displays reduce workload and provide reliable warnings for possible collisions. It is important to us to make sure our customers do not lose this capability.How is Dynon doing this? The regulations on ADS-B OUT are performance based, meaning that what matters is how well it performs in the real world. Dynon has analyzed the SV-GPS-250 as well as the whole SkyView system and determined that the system’s performance meets the requirements for a SIL and SDA of 1.Does this mean SkyView with an SV-GPS-250 is 2020 complaint? Unfortunately, no. The FAR has not changed, and after 2020 in order to fly in certain airspaces, you will still need a GPS that is compliant with the performance required in § 91.227. The SV-GPS-250 is not designed with this level of integrity in mind, and cannot be used for full ADS-B compliance. Thus, after Jan 1, 2020, you will either need to be equipped with a compliant GPS, or avoid airspace defined in § 91.225.Take me through all of this again. There are three ADS-B GPS position source categories: Hope all of this helps everyone understand the changes and options going forward. Please ask any questions and we'll do what we can to help. --Ian Jordan Dynon Avionics |
Ok. As I expected from Dynon, a good thing without a commitment to a much better thing in the future!
We are all well aware of your policy of not promising anything until it is ready to be shipped. You obviously we're around for the BD-12 fiasco. I continue to expect a reasonably priced replacement for the GPS-250 well before 2020, I just have to wait for the suprise. Thanks again. |
dynonsupport: THANKS for explaining the updated ADS-B requirements in words we can understand.
:cool: |
Dynon GPS
Quote:
Ian, Is the Dynon ultimate 2020 solution as easy as replacing the GPS-250 unit with a compliant one? Or are there other major system issues in the rest of the Skyview components that need to be addressed? |
Gil,
Dynon already supports fully 2020 compliant ADS-B out if you have a compliant GPS on board. It's legal, works, and many of our customers are already compliant and ready to go. There are no system issues preventing us from being compliant with any other future GPS that can demonstrate a SIL of 3 and an SDA of 2. |
Quote:
Thanks for the quick response. Can you help us by detailing some of the technical difficulties in making a hockey puck antenna that does meet the 2020 accuracy (SIL and SDA) requirements? Is it a production/traceability STC issue? ...or a more involved engineering design issue? |
Quote:
Out of curiosity (and perhaps to echo another poster), how much time/effort/money would saved by not having to do the full TSO paperwork, including all the FAA-required bureaucratic bookkeeping that doesn't affect the end product, and just meeting the technical performance part of the requirement? |
Thanks Dynon for being the only industry representative to cry foul when the FAA presented this idea last year, and for coming up with a reasonable solution.
I do have a question about your 10,000,000 hour figure. I've seen a reliability requirement of 99.99999%. If you report position once a second, I believe that comes out to one false report every 2777 hours. Thanks, Paige |
Paige,
Thanks for pointing out the statistical fuzziness I may have caused. The TSO does define failure as 1x10^-X. It allows you to define this as per sample, or per flight hour, and that definition is actually broadcast over ADS-B OUT as well. For level 3, this is 1x10^-7. This is 99.99999% as you mention. However, the regulation requires this be per hour from a GPS. From DO-260B: Quote:
It isn't as simple as 99.99999% of the one second samples you transmit needing to be accurate (2700 hours), but it's also not as simple as "only one failure per 10 million hours" as I over-simplified as well. It's a deep, wonky analysis that probably only 8 people in the world really understand. --Ian |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM. |