![]() |
High CHT's resolved and what worked.
Hi Friends...
History. I've been flying the RV 7A for two years. On climb out the number two CHT would always hit 400 before I reached 1000 feet! I had learned to live with it doing a kind of step climb thing.... level off/thottle back/ cool/then climb some more or enter a shallow cruise climb. I had tried the usual suggestions tight baffles etc. without success. Here's what worked and worked GREAT with several pics. You MUST/HAVE TO/WITHOUT FAIL.... get airflow beneath the forward part of the number two cylinder. I cut a hole then built a channel for air to get beneath that cylinder. Success! Now I can climb to around 4000 feet before I hit the upper 390? range. Around 4000 feet, the temperature levels off then starts dropping because of the cooler OAT's. Having such great success with the number two cylinder I decided to attack the number three CHT the same way. It didn't get quite as hot as number two but it was pretty close. Yesterday just for fun I took off and climbed at 120 kts all the way to 10,500. Incidentally, I was heading into the wind during by climb to 10,500 and my groundspeed had dropped to 99 mph! When I turned around to head home I was doing 240 mph across the ground! Wish I could do that every time I fly! Straight up... If a rather sloppy RTV application offends you, better bail here. Otherwise, here are the pis of the CHT fix. (I had reached the point that I was getting ready to start cutting the cowl to increase exit airflow. Happy now I had not done that yet!!!) You can visualize the airflow to the fins ![]() Number two cylinder from the bottom of the baffle ![]() Behind number three cylinder. Note minimal clearance for airflow ![]() ![]() Hole cut. I almost cut the wrong section of the baffle ![]() From the back ![]() Front/inside of baffle ![]() Looking down through newly created airflow channel ![]() From the back behind number three cylinder ![]() |
|
Right answer, wrong physics
Quote:
|
Dan, yours is a perfect and elegant solution. I wish I would have done mine that way. Sure looks better. End result is the same though and I'm thankful it worked.
Bob, Yes the engine produces less power with increasing altitude.... and truthfully I didn't think of that. With that said, as I previously mentioned I couldn't get to 1000 feet without hitting 400? and the temperature was still heading well north of that 400 mark as was cylinder no. three. I successfully brought my cylinder head tips down to normal levels in the first 4000 feet of climb... I'll let physics take care of the rest and thank you for helping me understand better. :-) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The question I have for you is, are you sure you have changed the cylinder temperatures or just the temperature indication? You basically are pushing cooler air directly at the temp probes this can cause a change in indicated temperature, but it might not change actual cylinder temperature.
|
I will support the post above. My thoughts exactly.
Unless you take 6 probes placed all around the cylinder head and retest it you can be creating egg shaped Vs round. This was done for the GAMI STC's for cooling on Bonanza cylinders, and nothing happens as you think it might, so hard data done with some proper analysis is the only way to know. |
Quote:
Of course, if the airflow is having a effect on the cylinder head, how is it different from the existing airflow to the same area of cyls 1 and 4? |
No biggie. The manufacturers have used that trick for years. "What do you mean the temps too high to certify? Oh well, put a blast tube on it. "
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM. |