![]() |
Aerosance FADEC With Propeller Control
Has anybody heard of anyone actually flying with Aerosance's FADEC system controlling a constant speed propeller? I haven't been able to find much on it. I'm wondering how pilots are liking it as well as weight and costs.
|
The Aerosance FADEC does not yet include control of the propeller, just the engine. It does have full control of the spark timing and electronic fuel injection. I have my deposit in and expect to take delivery early next year. As best I can tell there are about 150 in service. I've talked to a few owners flying, and all seem satisfied. It is expensive. Details, including pricing, are available at www.fadec.com.
|
Other information
Hi,
My understanding also is no FADEC prop control yet. We have the engine, harness and 7A in progress - saw the engine run at Mattituck - looks like a really good solution to me. The expense was justifiable for us based on the IO w/ Mags vs O + IOF upgrade. For yours (and others) information - a Yahoo group for AeroSance owners / builders / fliers is available ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Aerosance_Fadec ) - includes a range of aircraft (ie. non-RV) but good knowledge. Regards, Carl |
Sorry FADEC prop control, tried and they elected not to offer it
Quote:
The way they get a single prop/throttle on the Columbia or Cirrus (forget which one) is they use a mechanical link from the throttle control cable to move prop control with some kind of cam. It is not electronic as I thought. The tech guy I talked at Aerosance's, who has a Lancair builder, did something similar, a mechanical throttle/prop control link. Full throttle the prop is at high RPM, as you pull the throttle back, the prop is set to a lower RPM, a set amount, and that is it. Simple, like a two speed bike. The details of the mechanism I don't know. I don't know if you can override it or why you would want to give up the control of the prop? :confused: Personally, I absolutly don't get people going all goo goo over the single lever. I guess it's like a jet? Personally a prop control is so easy to use I fail to see the advantage. I think that is what Aerosances conclusion was and why they abandoned the prop control servo/governor. Here is a typical flight for the prop control (and petty much the mixture as well) Start, Taxi: nothingExcept for run-up, one RPM reduction and approach you are looking at three prop operations, only two in flight. Two lousy movements of the blue knob. :eek: :rolleyes: :D I am being a little toung in cheek, but how much would you be willing to pay for the FADEC auto prop RPM feature? How much extra weight? I understand it would be cool for the computer to control the RPM and why it seems like a cool idea, but what RPM's do you need to set: Low, medium and High. Also props vary and like different RPM. My Hartzell loved certain RPMs and in cruise I could tune it for smoother operations, seat of the pants. Last having all the extra control is probably not cost effective. Adding the complexity of a electro mechanical controlled hydraulic governor is also a challenge and no doubt be expensive. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 PM. |