VAF Forums

VAF Forums (https://vansairforce.net/community/index.php)
-   RV General Discussion/News (https://vansairforce.net/community/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Washers - NAS1149F0 vs AN960 (https://vansairforce.net/community/showthread.php?t=187126)

Amazon-1 09-22-2020 06:57 AM

Washers - NAS1149F0 vs AN960
 
OK, I am confused.

In Van's instructions (Section 05-33) it clearly says to NOT substitute a AN960 washer for a NAS1149 washer because the NAS washers are manufactured to a higher tolerance but when I try to buy NAS washers from Spruce they offer the 960 washers instead.

Is this a concern?

thanks,

bruce

rvbuilder2002 09-22-2020 08:18 AM

The main concern is in situations where the plans call out the use of washers as spacers......

Even though both washer designations are aircraft grade hardware, the NAS part has a much tighter tolerance for thickness than the AN washers have.

This causes a lot of problems when calling out a specific # of washers for an assembly that they are used as spacers in.

So in instances where you are just using a washer for the common purpose of load distribution and abrasion protection AN960's are fine, but NAS should be used when it looks like a specified stack-up is dimensionally sensitive.

jacoby 09-22-2020 09:38 AM

I measured a couple batches of AN960 (one from ~1983 and one from last year from AS) and the NAS1149 washers supplied by Van's. The AN960s came in consistently 0.002-0.003" undersized at 0.060-0.061". The NAS1149 were 0.0063-0.0064". n=5 from each batch.

Interestingly I also have mixed in with the old batch of AN960s some washers that have a silver-colored plating (nickel?) and match the NAS washer thickness.

Fly2eat 09-28-2020 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002 (Post 1464197)
The main concern is in situations where the plans call out the use of washers as spacers......

Even though both washer designations are aircraft grade hardware, the NAS part has a much tighter tolerance for thickness than the AN washers have.

This causes a lot of problems when calling out a specific # of washers for an assembly that they are used as spacers in.

So in instances where you are just using a washer for the common purpose of load distribution and abrasion protection AN960's are fine, but NAS should be used when it looks like a specified stack-up is dimensionally sensitive.

Hi Scott,
I'm trying to cross reference the 5702-75-060 and 5702-95-30 washers and it appears this may be a Vans part number. Is there a better part number to cross reference? I have a big order going to Spruce for other stuff and wanted to include those. It calls for them on the RV-4 blueprints on drawing 28.
L. D.

RV7A Flyer 09-28-2020 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fly2eat (Post 1465695)
Hi Scott,
I'm trying to cross reference the 5702-75-060 and 5702-95-30 washers and it appears this may be a Vans part number. Is there a better part number to cross reference? I have a big order going to Spruce for other stuff and wanted to include those. It calls for them on the RV-4 blueprints on drawing 28.
L. D.

I think someone figured out years ago those aren't *actually* "washers" in the AN/NAS sense...they're *spacers*.

HAL Pilot 01-10-2021 07:35 PM

Would it make sense to use stainless washers on the aileron and flap hinges?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 PM.