![]() |
Quote:
You have it nailed. Number 2 is easier than number 1. I, for one and others I know of are testing the Nordlock theory. Others, Loctite. I expected us to be the beta testers because as you say, "we are the field" and that is the way experimental aircraft are made safer. Your number 1 is very puzzling because it could save lives. We can only contact those we know of. Others have much larger resources to get the message out. And when you realize that many of them are readers and contributors to this forum its stunning. The EAA alone participates in this forum and yet ignores this issue. Are they all waiting for Van's to bless their comments? This is experimental, grass roots aviation, not corporate politics. Of course if you think about it, safety issues only become issues following fatalities. Shouldn't be much of a wait. Thanks for your personal concerns. |
Bolts
I have been thinking about this problem really hard of late. I have on hand the Nord Lock washers and both blue and red Loc Tite, and debating which to use.
Fortunately the real harm done so far is only to Van's reputation. I have been a customer since 1993 (I think it was) when I began building an RV6A, and now the RV-12, and in all that time I genuinely believed Van's organization was an honest and forthright organization. This current departure from their highly regarded (and deserved) reputation is really strange. Unless something is done promptly to repair this self-inflected harm it is going to take a long time to undo the damage. Its only my opinion, and just like belly buttons, we all have one. |
Hey John - -
I would NOT recommend RED Loctite. It takes lots of heat to get them out, and that may create other issues. I'd again suggest BLUE, and check them often as you feel comfortable. After this morning, I am now at 209.9 hours. They seem to be fine. As I have also said, I have around 100 hours on them, and they have not moved. If we find the nord-lock washers to be good also, fine, use BOTH. You could take them out if you want/need to, but could fly with confidence they are not going to fall out.
John Bender |
Notify Email From Vans!
I just received a Notify email from Vans containing the info about the mounting bolts. So now the info is going out to all owners.:D
|
I have learned that
In life, when common sense and practicality 'appear' to have been left behind, that there is a lawyer is involved.
|
Quote:
Incidentally, they have just issued revision D of page 46-06 in the RV12 section on the website. |
Bolts slightly loose at 20 hours
Just finished checking the bolts and modifying the engine shroud on N143WM at 20.1 hours.
All bolts were torqued to 310 in-lb PER THE RV-12 MANUAL at installation. At 20.1 hours all bolts required 10-15 deg of turn to go back to 310 in-lbs. I removed all the bolts, inspected them, coated them with lots of blue Loctite 243, reinstalled them and torqued them to 360 in-lb. All bolts were torque marked so I can see if they've moved at "regular" intervals, whatever "regular" comes to mean. I increased the size of the slot in the shroud so the upper left bolt could be removed. I did not remove the powder coating inside the mount since it hadn't been mentioned at the time and I'm not sure how it can be done with the engine in place. After removing the lower right bolt it could not be reinstalled until enough pressure was put on ther arm of the mount to flex it down almost 1/16 inch. A friend whose entire career at Wright-Pat says that the problem is due to something in the structure flexing in the right way to set up a resonant frequency-- possible the lower right motor mount arm? That's the only bolt that did not go right back in. The real problem, and one I'd think the whole LSA community would be VERY concerned about, is that the ONLY structural fasteners in the whole airplane that DO NOT have self-locking nuts, cotter pins, or safety wires are the 4 bolts holding the engine on! Is that ASTM standards??? If so, then I think the first time the FAA finds the engine of an RV-12 a half-mile from the crumpled wreckage, the result will make the CH-601 ruckus look insignificant! My feeling is that the real solution may be a re-designed motor mount with a way to safety those 4 bolts. Wayne 120241/N143WM |
E-mail notification
Well maybe only to those with an engine, I have only the Empennage kit, no e-mail from them and I know they have it, but it makes sense as I don't have an engine yet.
Quote:
|
All Four Capscrews Retorqued to 360 in-lbs
Finished checking all four engine mounting capscrews. At 85 hours, found three of the four slightly loose. Was able to get about 1/8 of a turn on the three. The fourth (one of the lower ones) need not budge at 310 in-lbs.
Van's tells you to use a ball end 8mm allen to get to the upper right capscrew. My drip tray was squarely in-line with the capscrew head and as such I had to remove the right side carb, the right side carb flange and drip tray. The o-ring popped out. It had swelled in diameter. It was not crushed. Could not get it back in the slot. Have another on order from LEAF. $6. Suggest having one on hand if you decide to remove the flange and drip tray. It also could have been my o-ring and how it reacted to alcohol free gasoline. Felt I would get a better torque, and minimize any capscrew head damage if I was square to the capscrew head and had full allen wrench engagement?? A little more work but not hard and I felt better. Did all of you guys that have checked the upper right have to REMOVE the drip tray?? The o-ring will be here Tuesday or Wednesday. No real problem as we got 7" of snow in the last 24 hours. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 AM. |