Answers Answers Answers
I do not want to speak for Larry's Vetterman but he posted on a Yahoo group he did not feel, in his opinion the 4-into-1 was much better. I don't share that feeling. The thing is he has the X-over system down and sells a boat load I am sure, so I don't think he is going to develop a new design. However the fact is people who have done a before and after, having a x-over and than later switching to the 4 in 1, notice the increased power, prop over revving and of course faster climb and higher speeds.
(Floor thumping)
ON the similar note, FLOOR THUMPING comments are few. I have only heard of one complaint of more floor vibration after installation of a 4 into 1 on a side by side model. First, any RV floor vibrates anyway. My RV-4 shook all the time. If you ask that person who says their floor vibrates more with the 4 into 1, they will say the performance gain was very apparent, so I think it is hard to complain with the gains and don't think its an issue. As was suggested pipe angle, collector length and floor insulation / damping all affect the situation. ON the RV-8 with the narrow floor I don't think it vibrates as much as the side-by-side anyway. The side-by-side has the large flat floor to move. I have a longer stinger (collector) on my custom 4 into 1 pipe. I know the stock off the shelf ones are a little shorter, but at a steaper angle from the belly. I think they did this for looks more than anything. The best collector length is 19.5-30 inches long, which most don't want, but I have a 19.5 collector at a shallow angle. The shorter collector looses a little performance but not much. Really to take advantage of a 4 into 1 you would use a custom CAM, and the breathing would really open up, but even without a custom CAM the 4 into 1 is like free HP.
(X-over, 4 into 1 and 4 into 4)
Larry does make a 4 into 4, 4 separate pipes. This is a cool system and works well, From the Cafe foundation the 4 into 4 separate pipes has some good characteristics, like even or balanced power, low back pressure with some but small savaging. In word it has no bad habits but is not a huge plus. You could do WAY worse, like Y-pipes, 2 into 1 on the same side, with odd pipe length.
(Heat muff)
I found on my exhaust technologies 4 into 1 pipe, making room for a long heat muff a little bit of a challenge. Remember "Tuned" pipe lengths or equal lengths requires some bends and curves. I had custom 4 into 1 exhaust made from a pattern I sent them, which is something they still do. So the way I designed my "Headers" was a little tight (see picture below). I only left room for one heat muff. This was before Exhaust Technologies had the stock off the shelf unit. Now they have off the shelf units and I am sure they allow pipe runs that are stright long enough to fit a heat muff or two. I am sure they have accounted a little better for the heat muff. THE COOL thing or should say the HOT thing is they can weld on studs as an option to the pipe to increase the heat muff efficiency by a huge margin. This is a process they use in aerospace heat exchangers. The impressive thing about this company is they do have high tech aerospace manufacture abilities with stainless steel stuff, for all kinds of certified aircraft applications.
I recommend Aircraft Exhaust Technologies, but I do think the installation is not as compact as the cross over. The cross over is NOT bad but it does suffer one physical draw back. If you measure the pipe lengths, primaries, collectors for every cylinder they very from jug to jug, so you don't have "Balanced pipes". What does that mean. It means the power from each cylinder will not have same "scavenging" and the power from the individual cylinders very. The savaging is there but not the to the extent or timing you get with the 4 into 1.
Exhaust Technologies also makes a cross over system as well!! They also have a cool Heat muff/ Muffler (noise) combo.
http://www.aircraftexhaust.net/
Click on pictures to enlarge, you can see the heat studs, the "cover" of the heat muff in not installed. I found plenty of room on #1 pipe. I did not really have room for more heat muffs the way I designed the pipes, but you can design them anyway you want. As I said the stock ones look like they used longer straight sections so heat muffs are not an issue.