What's new
Van's Air Force

Don't miss anything! Register now for full access to the definitive RV support community.

Whirlwind 151 (not-H) failure

flyeyes

Well Known Member
As some of you know, a Lancair was forced down north of Memphis late last year by an inflight failure of a Whirlwind 151.

The pilot is a friend of mine, and asked me to forward the following post to the RV list. He is posting on the Lancair list and has forwarded a copy for posting on the Yahoo list as well.

To be very clear, the prop that failed is not identical to the currently shipping 151-H. The original 151 had aluminum ferrules that were noted to have high wear that resulted in an SB last spring requiring very frequent inspection intervals, or replacement of the blades with a newer design. The prop that failed had the older aluminum ferrules.

I really like the 151-H on my RV-8, and it means that my FWF is as light as a parallel valve/Hartzell combo with the CG more aft. There isn't another prop that compares at the weight.

After Dan's forced landing though, I am watching it very carefully..

James: Thanks for passing this on...
Regards, Dan

WHIRLWIND PROP ALERT

Please pass this on to anyone who operates a Whirlwind propeller (specifically Series 151 3-blade composite)

I have built and have been flying a Lancair-360 with a Lyc IO-360 / Whirlwind 151 prop combination for approximately 2.5 years and on December 17th of 2007, following a routine 45-minute flight, I experienced medium to severe front end vibration which ultimately resulted in an off-airport forced landing.

While turning onto a deep base leg to allow for slower traffic on final at my home airport I made my final prop pitch adjustment and almost immediately vibration began and intensified within 2-3 seconds. Engine responded appropriately to throttle input, however vibes only got worse with the throttle pushed up. At this point I realized I was flying a 1000 fpm flying speed brake. At 900’ and one and a half miles from the intended runway, no way was I going to make the airport. Saw an available field straight ahead, contemplated the gear-up/gear-down option and chose to take my chances with the gear down (leaving the gear down, in this case, actually proved to be the better choice). Touchdown was approximately 80-85 KIAS (with slight tailwind = 100mph), and rollout was approximately 450’. The nose gear ultimately failed halfway through the rollout as it attempted to muscle through the rain-saturated ground. I was very fortunate in that the ground was relatively flat with no berms, etc. Reality check: sometimes these things happen quickly; the actual time from the moment of failure to the point I’m popping the canopy open on the ground was 45 seconds (no exaggeration, I did the math). Soapbox: advice I can offer; continue to fly the airplane; straight ahead is usually better then attempting a tight turn. We’ve all been taught from day one: aviate, navigate, communicate, in that order. My only mistake was not communicating; a simple “178DM going down” would have sufficed. As it turned out, there were no witnesses on the ground, so the situation could have been dire had I been trapped. Other than a new prop, engine inspection, NG assembly, and cowl work, damage was minimal. Here’s a tidbit; for those who are thinking of incorporating the outback gear; don’t need it in my opinion…the real stresses are on the nose gear.

Back to the prop: post flight analysis revealed that one of the pitch link pins to one of the blades (particularly the pin that fits into the blade ferrule) had pulled itself out, causing the blade to go negative pitch. There were also other stress marks indicating excessive and uneven wear and tear of the bottom of the ferrules where the pins make contact. In addition, this prop had approximately 39 hours (185 hrs total) since the overhaul generated by a Whirlwind service letter (#SL-151-042607) dated 5/4/2007.

The primary reason I solicit this post is to alert anyone who may be operating a Whirlwind series 151 prop with aluminum ferrules. For now, Whirlwind is treating this event as an isolated incident, therefore an AD or some sort of service difficulty letter may or may not be forthcoming.

Please note that since I am not a metallurgist I will not, therefore, comment or formulate an opinion on the design of the prop. The original design is a steel pin fitted into an aluminum blade ferrule (the base which houses the blade). There had been other issues with premature wear and tear of the aluminum ferrules as well. Whirlwind has since begun to manufacture and use steel ferrules blades, in which you have a steel pin fitted into a steel ferrule.

Bottom line: if you have a series 151 aluminum ferrule prop, I would recommend to at least pull the front hub plate and inspect the pins frequently, else bite the bullet and get the steel ferrule blades.

I you have any questions regarding this incident, the manufacturer, lessons learned (i.e. what you can expect following an incident or mishap), pix of the incident (google my name Daniel Lukschander, link WMCTV), or pix of the prop hub, opinions, don’t hesitate to contact me via phone or email.


Respectfully submitted,


Dan Lukschander [email protected] (901) 218-7401 cel
L-360, N178DM

PS. I’m getting a Hartzell


 
Last edited:
thanks for posting

Thank you. since i also have a 151 with aluminum ferrules, it is valuable info

steve ciha
 
Back
Top