IowaRV9Dreamer said:
Rob - keep these coming - I'm already planning on your unit for my 9A. I'm interested in the certified AHRS software. Thanks so much!
dave
Yes, thanks for the screen shots - great stuff!
Let me second the interest in the details of the AHRS. When upgrade to an IFR panel, my first concern will be the reliability of the instruments. Cost is second and functionality is actually third. If I can't rely on it, I don't want it. if I can't afford it, I don't care what it does.
Vacuum instruments are not attractive because of low reliability, moderate cost and maintenance and low functionality. Cost puts the units like the G900X and Chelton out of my price range, as much as I like the Chelton. The price for Dynon, GRT sport and AFS are attractive, and they offer most of the functionality I want. I've excluded BMA due to concerns about delivery and support - this has been discussed elsewhere and I won't rehash it here.
But what is the reliability of the systems, in particular the AHRS? One of the advantages of the Chelton system is that you can use whatever AHRS you want, including the more expensive, certified XBOW AHRS that has been, AFAIK, perfect. However, you're getting into serious money there.
How do we judge the reliability of these systems? Each of these three have done a lot of work on the systems to make them solid and reliable as well as functional. But, on the reliability side, how do you compare them? Are they all equally reliable, at least within a reasonable level?